Is A&R Still Necessary In Today's Music Industry?

Written By: Jim Markunas
Photo Credit: Ryan McVay

In the olden days, A&R was king in the music industry. Young, hip guys in street clothes found the latest "big thing" in music. The A&R rep romanced said band, persuaded them to sign an exclusive contract (which still exists today), hand-picked tracks for placement on albums released by said band, and more importantly selected which tracks from the album were to be the "singles."

Said band's "singles" went on to get major radio play, the radio play led to press coverage and both the press coverage and radio play led to said band's albums selling off the shelves. It was a GREAT thing to have competent A&R reps with a "good ear" back in the hay days of the music biz when music was an art form above all else.

Then... CD burners happened... Then... Napster happened... Then... CD Baby happened. Nowadays, any band in existence can get their own high-level distribution deal for a mere $30. That's right, for $30, any band with songs committed to record can have their tracks and albums available everywhere from iTunes to Wal-Mart.com. In addition, consumers can get any song in existence for free on the internet.

The above set of phenomenon has led to the over-saturation and overt over-commercialism of music. Music, although still an art form is now more than ever a commodity; much like burnable DVDs and tulips.

This begs the question, "Is A&R still necessary in today's music industry?"

Before answering this dire rhetorical question, take into account the following factors:

1. A&R used to be about finding a great artist and picking great singles to drive record sales. Nowadays, records don't sell; it's now possible to have a No. 1 radio hit and a corresponding LP that sells a mere 35,000 copies. (Somewhere around 500,000 units is usually the break-even point for most standard recording agreements.)

2. Quality of songs were king and were the driving force behind record sales. Today, quantity of songs are king in the minds of consumers.

3. There were no shortage of bands chomping at the bit to be signed to a major label to be used as necessary. Here and now, bands like Clap Your Hands Say Yeah and Arcade Fire can sell out arenas and pressings of albums without the help of a major label. There's a famous industry anecdote in which CYHSY had meetings with several major labels and flatly refused to sign their contracts as the band felt the majors couldn't do anything for them that they hadn't already done for themselves - Prior to 2004 this was unheard of!

4. A&R reps were gate-keepers and taste-makers who filtered out the crap. Nowadays, consumers perform that very function on their own via Pirate Bay, Limewire and Myspace.

5. Quality of indie bands have increased, and industry standard sound quality of recorded music has decreased. Back in the day, not many bands could afford to spend $1,000 an hour on studio time, and no one had even heard of the iPod. Today, bands can record their own songs on Pro-Tools in their basements, and the iTunes generation is used to poor sound quality. (The MP3 is not nearly as rich as CD audio or even Vinyl, but kids and adults alike LOVE their iPods that contain low-quality MP4 files from the iTunes store.)

In the future, will labels be as willing to pay high A&R and artist advances? I can't say for sure. But... I can say that marketing and new media will always be necessary. In the near future, A&R as a whole may take a back seat as "eye-balls" and volumes of demographic information become the new king of the music industry.

Jim Markunas is a music industry futurist and editor-in-chief of Chicks With Guns Magazine. Jim has a decade of new media and music industry experience, he's run highly successful new media campaigns and has worked with James Brown, Miles Davis, The Walt Disney Company, Truckee Brothers, Mick Fleetwood, and Minty Fresh Records. Currently Jim's focus is monetization strategies for record labels and digital business development. 

Find Jim Online:
Twitter - Linkedin - Facebook - Website - E-mail Jim

Read more... 0 Responses

3 Reasons Why The Pirate Bay Trial Was A Loss For The Music Industry

 "So let me get this straight. The Pirate Bay shuts down and suddenly all its users go legit, stop trading and start buying the wares of the entertainment companies." - Bob Lefsetz

The music industry is the only industry in the world that is willing to take civil and legal action against its own consumers. Think about that for a moment... When was the last time GM or Apple Computer put you in jail? 

Although piracy is wrong on a lot of levels, it simply cannot be stopped in a cost effective and/or mutually beneficial manner. 

Here's why the Pirate Bay prosecution was yet another colossal failure for the music industry even though its being touted as a "victory."

1. "You'll Never Get Her Back on the Farm Once She's Been to Gay Paree" 

The cat's been out of the bag for a while... As a consumer, you simply don't have to pay for music. Every song ever released is available on the internet for free in MP3 form. As an industry, we must come to the horrible realization (and really realize it) that most people aren't willing to pay $18.99 for something that they can get for free.

The music industry will never be able to get consumers to pay for music now that it's been free for the last 9 years. Sure... some albums sell, but those days are numbered.

2. Alienating One's Target Market is the Surest Way NOT to Sell a Product or Idea

People view record labels and music industry professionals as greedy and dishonest. This is a fact. It's brought on partly because of the way we've done business in the last 70 years, but mostly because we've resorted to suing college students, jailing talented computer programmers, and strong-arming universities across the US.

As an industry, we suck! We'll have to learn to "un-suck" in order to get things moving again. If we can win back public trust, we can turn a profit once more.

3. Touting Pirate Bay as a "Victory" Buys Into The Outdated Business Model of "Selling Records" 

Yes, music industry, it was great when we had a physical product and people paid us handsomely for it, but those days are going the way of the dinosaur - If we don't start to explore new income streams as an industry we're going to be extinct faster than the dodo. 

Suing pirates in a "whack-a-mole" fashion not only costs labels millions of dollars in legal fees and damages the reputation of the music biz as a whole, but also points our Tyrannosaurus Rex-like, single-pointed focus in a direction that's failing - towards the old business model!

If the music business' old business model was working, we wouldn't have to sue pirates, because we'd be too rich to care.

I hereby proclaim the album dead! Now what?? 

OBLIGATORY PLUG: Let's become too rich to care! Let's make filesharing work for the business instead of against it. E-mail me for an interview, and we can discuss how to make the music business work without selling records.

Read more... 0 Responses

Retailers Shun The Music Industry?

Written By: Jim Markunas
Photo Credit: Stephen St. John

"February 20, 2010, is the day the CD dies."

That's what Tunecore president, Jeff Price was quoted as saying in an interview with the SF Examiner.

The quote goes on to say, "This is going to be the last year where there's any form of significant revenue generated from CD sales. The majors are going to be able to keep Walmart and Borders and Best Buy and Barnes & Noble into stocking inventory through this last Christmas season, but after that, the floor space is going to shrink significantly, and CDs are gonna go.'"

There you have it! There's speculation that after the 2009 Christmas season, retailers may drop physical music merchandise (i.e., CDs) completely.

What does that mean for us as an industry?

CDs will eventually go the way of vinyl. They'll be collector's items at indie stores around the world. However, there's two fundamental problems:

1. Vinyl sales alone can't finance a whole industry, and the same will soon be true regarding compact discs.

2. In the not-so-distant future, all music will be free. Yes... this means traditional music sales will generate little to no revenue.

Taking these two factors into consideration, it's important for the music industry to explore alternate sources of revenue. The internet is a vast space with limitless financial possibilities. There are literally millions of ways to generate revenue online, and there's no reason we can't start to use a few of these fresh new revenue streams as an industry.

Key point to remember: Everything can be monetized on the internet if digital space is leveraged efficiently. 

OBLIGATORY PLUG: If you like my style, and think I can benefit your company shoot me an e-mail to set up an interview.

Read more... 0 Responses

3 Reasons Why Analytics Are Important For The Music Biz

Written By: Jim Markunas

I'm not a fan of Michael Jackson... for several reasons (sorry). However... I LOVE Mr. Jackson's sales record for "Thriller." This landmark release sold 40 million copies worldwide, and is hailed as the best-selling album of all time.

I assume the album after "Thriller" didn't do as well because I'm not sure what the follow-up album was called. In my humble opinion, this phenomenon highlights the importance of analytics and direct marketing. I say this because the decade surrounding "Thriller" was a hot time period for Michael Jackson musically. I'm pretty sure the follow-up album for "Thriller" was just as good musically as its predecessor.

Now... Imagine if we had had the internet back in those days. What if Sony had utilized a collected database of Michael Jackson's 40 million fans to promote the next record?

Labels have the tendency to over-emphasize mass marketing when direct marketing could be our ticket out of our industry-wide slump. I'll tell you why:

1. Highly-Targeted Demographic Information is Worth a lot of $$$!

There are firms out there that will pay top dollar for the right detailed demographic information everyone from Proctor & Gamble to Live Nation. 

That's a bold new revenue stream right there.

2. Direct Marketing Puts Fish in Barrel For Us To Shoot. 

Why isn't Live Nation hurting for cash in these tough economic times? They're not suffering because they pay close attention to their analytics and demographic information. They control the world's largest database of music fans and they know how to use it. 

Live Nation can tell who should receive direct marketing based on demographic information, plus they can tell how receptive people are to their direct marketing efforts based on back-end analytics. We could all learn a thing or two from Live Nation in this regard.

3. Spend Less Money, Get More Results.

"Where's my budget?!?!?!" Good question! Budgets are shrinking nowadays, as we all know too well. That means that we no longer have the luxury of spending a million dollars on an ad campaign for an artist. That's perfectly fine with me, as mass marketing is not easy to measure.

I say this with 90% certainty, as my college text-book in Advertising 101,  said "Market research on a mass level is ineffective, and the numbers shouldn't be relied upon as gospel. Market research on a mass level should only be conducted to help sway your clients to your advertising plan."

That's a bold statement for a text book!!!! Furthermore, it proves the importance of direct marketing, which can easily be measured, targeted and custom-tailored. 

Think about it, direct marketing is approximately 1/8 the price of mass marketing, and yields measurable results, as it makes the consumer feel less anonymous in an ad-cluttered world.

As an industry, I highly recommend that we pay attention and show respect for our digital analytics and demographics. 

OBLIGATORY PLUG: I talk about this extensively in my New Media plan. E-mail me to set up an interview.

Read more... 0 Responses

4 Reasons Why YouTube Is Bad For The Music Biz

Written By: Jim Markunas

Sure, I like to watch "Office Freakout" and other viral video classics, as a consumer of online media, but... were I a band or record label, I would shun YouTube just like the Warner Music Group did earlier last year.

YouTube has great viewership, and is as much of a household name as Google. 

However, just because something is popular, 
it doesn't mean that it's right... or that it's right for your brand or business.

I'm going to discuss the four biggest pitfalls of using YouTube to promote music videos and various other intellectual property.

1. No Ad Revenue!!!!  -

I've been told by a few record execs that they've "worked out a 'deal' with YouTube," or are "in talks with YouTube to work out a 'deal.'" So what? 

Just because YouTube has good intentions, doesn't mean that they're going to suddenly become an overnight source of income. Let me show you how money is lost by posting any intelelctual property on YouTube.
As you can see in my picture on the left, Hannah Montana's "7 Things" video, garnered over 65,000,000 views. 

Although this is great publicity; publicity doesn't necessarily make money.

Had Hollywood Records decided to go with a video service willing to offer a $3 CPM for video viewership, they could have made bank on this video with a projected profit of $196,000.

Split between the label and the artist, as most contracts allow for, that would have been roughly $100,000 in revenue for the label (enough to recoup the video and then some) and $100,000 for the artist. 

There are viral video sites out there that offer a paid model for music video views. Although some of these other sites don't quite have the viewership that YouTube has, I can only reiterate the #1 rule of financial accounting: "$1 today is better than $0 tomorrow."

2. No Sales Leverage - 

You've seen them... pop-up affiliate ads that attempt to coax YouTube viewers into buying the MP3 version of the music video being streamed. This "last ditch" technique is both intrusive and ineffective, and will not:

A. Convince consumers to pay for music.

B. Correlate the relationship between YouTube views and record sales.

In addition, an artist can have 1,000,000 views on YouTube and not sell any albums or singles. This phenomenon happens not only because people aren't inclined to pay for something they can get for free, but also since YouTube is not seen as a viable retailer by consumers. What is the "carrot on the end of the stick" for consumers watching a free music video? There really isn't one if you think about it.

3. Pirated/Duplicate Content - 

Ok readers, let's say you and I have a record label with 4 hot artists. For argument sake, let's say we have Madonna, The Red Hot Chili Peppers, U2, and the Foo Fighters. In an effort to get on the "publicity train" we post their current singles in video form on YouTube. 

It seems that the day after we post our videos, YouTube users not affiliated with or employed by our label have posted the same music videos on their user accounts, thereby retarding our number of views.

I'll tell you why this is a problem... Not only is it a copyright infringement, but in turn, the duplicate/pirated content detracts from our label's number of views. Imagine that we do have a CPM/ad-share deal in place with YouTube.... We've essentially lost money to pirates (again).

YouTube doesn't have the same top-notch copyright standards that other viral video sites have.

4. They're Just Not Good Businessmen - 

I can't in good conscience recommend a site that can't keep itself solvent. According to Google's annual report, YouTube is operating at at $470 million a year loss. Maybe we music biz folks like YouTube because YouTube's bad business sense makes us look like financial gurus.  Yes??? Maybe?? (Crickets chirp as people give me dirty looks).

**Author's note: I apologize to my constituents for the harsh words. 

I do believe we can work together to make music videos and other intellectual property profitable via the internet. I've covered this extensively in my New Media Plan. Before you watch the video, feel free to e-mail me for an interview. I promise I wont harm your office.


Read more... 3 Responses

4 Reasons Giving Music Away For Free Can Significantly Increase Profits

Written By: Jim Markunas

Once upon a time, in a faraway land, the music industry had a successful business model. A band would sign a contract with a major label, the label would press an album of songs; they controlled the distribution of said album - Consumers could only purchase the album in a store. The label also paid radio for airplay, thereby driving the only means of promotion (with the exception of print media). You had a single on the radio (anywhere from 1-4 per release depending on sales), and you had an album in stores. Viola! The labels drove record sales, large profits ensued, and everyone was happy (even most of the bands). 

This aforementioned model was extremely lucrative and effective for decades until the introduction of the internet and Napster in the late 90s; then the rules changed. The unthinkable happened... labels no longer had a choke hold on distribution. Worse yet, people stopped listening to radio as the internet was much more satisfying. After all that... record sales tanked so badly, people were leaving their record label jobs to work at AIG. 

As an industry, we can no longer depend on selling records as our main source of income in today's digital-driven market. The reason being, consumers have seen that we are powerless to make them pay for the old model. People that are in my age group (23-30) realize that stealing music is wrong, but do it anyway. That's bad enough, however... People in the 12-20 age range have no concept that music was ever sold as a product and have no qualms whatsoever about building vast music collections on Limewire. 

With that said, I'd like to introduce a small tidbit of my new business model. 

* Yes... It involves giving music away for free (author pauses for groans and screams of horror). But... I'm going to give you 4 reasons why giving music away for free will generate more revenue than selling it in stores. 

Reason # 1 - New Age DRM - Forget about the totalitarian DRM of 2004 perpetrated by Sony/BMG and iTunes that enraged consumers. I'm talking about an idea that hasn't been invented yet. New Age DRM will revolutionize the way the music industry does business. 

Imagine if you will, an MP3 on a website or P2P network. Embedded in that MP3 is an invisible demographic program that follows the file wherever it goes and collects user data without being detected by its user. The data-miner is able to show the copyright holder, i.e., the label distributing the free MP3 everything it wants to know about its consumer. If said consumer is playing said MP3 on his/her iTunes or iPhone while surfing the internet, the data-mining program will broadcast this demographic information to the label that owns the MP3.

This is quite powerful information for a company to have on a lot of levels. Imagine, if at the touch of a button, and in real-time, labels were able to discern their target market's favorite websites, buying habits, etc. That type of info is WILDLY invaluable, which leads me to point number 2...

Reason #2 - The Magic of Eyeballs A.K.A. Demographics - We can't control wallets and ears anymore as an industry, but we can control eyeballs; which are worth much more monetarily than $.69 from a sale off iTunes. 

Imagine that we've given the new Lil' Wayne album away for free on the internet in return for demographic information (e-mail, address, 3 favorite websites, etc.). That essentially means, we not only control the demographic info for 5 million people worldwide, but we also in turn can control what they see. 

Yes, they've gotten the Lil' Wayne album completely free via digital download, but in return they had to not only give us pertinent info about themselves, but we also coded each MP3 to play an ad. 

Not only do we charge advertisers for our highly-targeted eyeballs, but we also control per-person demographic information that can be sold multiple times for $10 a head. Compare that to the pittance received from album sales nowadays. 

Reason #3 - Passive Income - What's the difference between real estate, or property and "intellectual" estate, or property??? Ready?

Real estate owners are smart enough to earn substantial and ever-increasing amounts of revenue and asset allocation off of their properties without doing any back-breaking work (Better known as "passive income"). In the digital age, blogs and various other websites make most of their money from passive income.

What if music real estate (websites, blogs, Twitter pages, etc.) could generate passive income? Would we still need to sell records?

Reason #4 - Sponsorship, Cross-Promotion, and Advertising - You can't squeeze blood from a turnip (i.e., consumers), therefore, get money from people who have it, (i.e., advertisers and market researchers.)

Let me back-track a little. Suppose you're a college graduate and you're looking for a job. Let's also say that there are two companies that are interested in hiring you; Company A and Company B.

Company A wants you to clean toilets for $4.00 an hour 60 hours a week. Company B wants you to manage 10 toilet-scrubbers for $100.00 an hour.  Which job do you, as the college grad choose?

Take a moment to think about your answer... Great! 

Now... Realize that the college grad is the music industry, the average consumer is Company A, and other corporations with advertising/sponsorship budgets are Company B. 

As an industry, we need to realize that getting consumers to fall in love with us again so that we can leverage their "eyeballs" in return for substantial revenue from advertisers and products will save the music biz. 

If you'd like to discuss my New Media Plan in person, please feel free to shoot me an e-mail to set up an appointment.

Read more... 0 Responses

3 Ghosts of Christmas Future For the Music Biz

The browser may be the new iPod, but what's the new browser?

Ready???

It's simple. The mobile phone. 

* Just as we had to bow and scrape for Microsoft in the mid-to-late 1990s, we must now take our hats off to Apple - The iPod revolutionized the way most music fans listen to their personal catalogs of sound, the iPod Touch drove the final coffin nail into the dated Palm Pilot, and the iPhone single-handedly changed the world. 

A year-and-a-half ago, my friends at Disney (the only people making enough money to afford one at the time) had purchased iPhones. Within two weeks, their codependence with this "toy" rivaled that of Bobby and Whitney, and bordered on downright obsession. The death of conversation in place of incessant calendar/e-mail checking annoyed me to no end... until now.

Take a moment and ponder the sheer brilliance of the iPhone.... OK.... Let's move on. 

The iPhone, much like the iPod, has most of the US market share in interactive cellular phones, rivaled by the Blackberry Curve (A.K.A. iPhone light) and the Samsung Sidekick (A.K.A. the new Motorola Razr).  

* In the not-so-distant future, the iPhone will be replaced, or will replace itself - What will the new iPhone look like? Logically, mobile phone technology will have to integrate itself further into the everyday lives of consumers. Image if you will, one single device that has the ability to field phone calls, play MP3s, manage your e-mail accounts, etc. (This is the current iPhone). Now... Imagine if you will, a device that performs all of the aforementioned tasks, and in addition can perform the following:

1. This one device will be able to play through your car stereo via Bluetooth without having to take your ride to "get pimped."

2. This new device will act as your CPU in addition to your iPod, Outlook, and cellular phone. Picture seamlessly bringing your computer with you wherever you go; much like a laptop, but the size of an iPod, and having the ability to be "docked" to a monitor, keyboard and mouse via laser technology.

3. This device will replace TV, offering the same major and cable television networks that one would get at home. (Think Apple TV without all that "being too ahead of its time" problem.) Wouldn't it be cool to watch CNN on your phone as if you were sitting in your living room watching Time Warner Cable? Better yet!!! This device will play through your computer or Plasma TV via laster technology.

Moving on...

**Note** I've been pretty harsh on the record labels and music biz as a whole lately. I probably should apologize, and just may when one of you inevitably hires me : )

* Yes, Jim, the iPhone rocks, but what does that mean for the Music Industry?  - Good question, music biz! The industry will eventually have to jump on this technological bandwagon in order to make money. I'm going to outline a few ideas covered in my New Media Plan. The following are dilemmas; my plan solves them.

1. The app - Disney has a Hannah Montana iPhone app that managed to entertain me for a few minutes. Kudos, guys!!! Lady Gaga (Geffen/Universal) has a similar app. Kudos, IGA!!! These apps, however probably cost the label in R&D costs and labor, and fail to monetize, thereby spending money to attempt to reignite the antiquated business model of "selling records."

2. Point and Laugh at Zune... then say you're sorry. - We've all seen Chicago MC, Common on the Zune commercials. In the blink of an eye, Zune has gone from being behind the times to being ahead of its time. Imagine that this new device we've been talking about has an opt-in subscription service in which consumers will be able to listen to any song they want at any time and however many times they want for a pittance of of $18.99 a month ($200.00 a year). This is the scary reality of the digital age. How can labels stay afloat on $200.00 a year? 

3. Analytics - Labels and constituents... We all have a mailing list, how many of us have checked our analytics? Probably not a lot of us have looked into this on a higher level. This occurred to me a few years back when the honorable Ms. McCartney of iFanz.com turned me onto the concept of deeper-level web analytics as it pertains to nurturing an artist's fan base. Yes, Interscope, you send me a form letter whenever you release an album, but how can you tell if I opened your e-mail and read it? Better yet, how can you tell if I bought the advertised album and where I bought it from? In the age of cyberspace, content may be king, but analytics are the man behind the throne. Afterall, every Napoleon needs his Talleyrand.

Hey Labels! - I've explored and conquered these notions in my New Media Plan. Shoot me an e-mail to set up an interview.

Read more... 0 Responses

New Media Plan - Part 2 "Why Sell Albums?"

Physical is dead! Well... not completely, but think of physical sales as a 1962 Chevy Impala - A niche group of people still want to drive one, but most people would rather roll in a Hybrid. 

This begs the question, "If artists and labels stop selling albums, where does the money come from?" 

Great question! The internet has opened up a wealth of potential business models from affiliate-oriented programs to ad-supported streaming, just to name a few examples. 

Instead of relying on the antiquated notion of selling a square object to consumers for $15.99 a pop, artists and labels should band together to think of new ways to bring in revenue; not just in the digital forum, but in all marketplaces. 

A few key points to remember:

* There will be a jump in online sales in the immediate  future - According to Amazon.com (world's largest online retailer) and Amway (a company of legal Ponzi schemers), within the next 10 years consumers will be buying 70% of their goods online. This will be an extremely large shift from 35% in 2008. 

* This isn't just young consumers buying music and movies in the digital realm - Everything from cosmetics to food is currently purchased online by a wide range of consumers; even my old boss at Disney (an experienced corporate lawyer in his 50s) has admitted to buying his groceries via an "online delivery service." 

* The browser is the new iPod - According to Rio Caraeff (EVP UMG eLabs), the album is an antiquated notion in the face of technology that favors portability and instant gratification.

Hey Labels! - I've explored and conquered this notion in my New Media Plan. Shoot me an e-mail to set up an interview.

Read more... 0 Responses

The New Media Plan is Coming... Part 1 - Music Videos

Putting bad economic times aside, the music biz as a whole is still frantically trying to figure out how to monetize; they're also scrambling to understand the constantly changing digital landscape. I've solved everyone's problems. 

"Income in the New Media Age" - Part 1: 
Monetizing digital music video views.

With the exception of UMG's tentative Hulu deal, how is the industry supposed to monetize digital streams of music videos? I have several answers to that in my New Media Plan.

My New Media Plan is catching momentum, as major labels still continue to debate how to monetize music video plays and how to effectively reel in ad revenue off of intellectual property. My plan garnered significant interest from Walt Disney Records, and has led to meetings and consulting offers from other companies as well. 

**NOTE: If you're tired of not making money from YouTube views, you'll love my New Media Plan.

E-mail me to set up an appointment to discuss my New Media Plan

Read more... 0 Responses

Recent Posts

Twitter Updates

Followers

Recent Comments

My Blog List